Archive for category General

LA is Surprisingly bike friendly

Well, I just got back from a longish bike ride. I left my house at around 2:30, I think, and rode all the way downtown. There is actually a bike path most of the way that runs parallel to the 5. Here’s a map that I put together, I think this was the route I took.


I deviated from google’s recommended path a few times, and I see now that it would’ve helped if I’d printed the whole thing out ahead of time, since I rode parallel to a street with a bike lane for quite a while. At a certain point, I walked for a few blocks because traffic was a little hairy.

I took a couple of photos on the way with my iPhone. The LA river is actually pretty beautiful along this stretch. They’ve converted lots of it back to a real river instead of just being a concrete drainage ditch. I was impressed with the number of birds and plants I saw.

This was the only picture I took of the river, and now I wish I’d stopped to snap a couple more, especially the parts with birds. I guess I’ll have to go back.

Here’s MacArthur park at the end of my ride.  I was actually pretty close to where my friend Chris is doing her internship, but I was so tired at this point that I decided to just hop the metro home.

Creative Time Stewardship

I saw an article about a concept that I think would be really cool for a congregation to implement, it’s called a Time Bank. The idea is that people volunteer to help their neighbors and are credited with hours at the time bank. Then when they need help with something they can “withdraw” time and get help. The example they gave that really convinced me was getting or giving a ride to the airport, which is really expensive around here.

Imagine this group: an older widow, a young single construction worker, a busy accountant who travels frequently, and a couple with kids and a station wagon.

So the assets/needs of that group: cooking, sewing, lawn mowing, accounting, rides to the airport, babysitting, home repair, etc.


The accountant, for example, may not think she has any time to spare, but preparing everyone’s taxes would save them a lot of time. In return she could get rides to the airport from the couple with the station wagon, some meals prepared by the old lady to put in the freezer, her lawn mowed, etc.

The couple with kids are happy to give rides to the airport in their big station wagon or mow the lawn, so they could have the old lady or the construction worker babysit, get their taxes done by the accountant, get home repair done by the construction worker, etc.

The old lady might feel useless since her husband died, but she can cook, do mending, babysit, etc. and get her lawn mowed, her house fixed up, her taxes done, etc.

And the construction worker is happy do mow lawns and fix houses, but subsists on TV dinners and his clothes are wearing out. Well, you get the picture.

I think one piece that is really important that makes this different is that it allows the old widow to contribute her time doing the things that she’s best at instead of just having a work crew come from the church out of pity because her house is falling apart and her lawn is overgrown.

Of course, the primary benefit is that it builds community. People help each other and spend time together. It’s better than reciprocal favors because everyone gives their time to benefit the whole community so I’d hope it wouldn’t feel like a quid pro quo.

This could work by having one or two people coordinate the bank, but I like the idea of having a web app that could keep track of it all (I don’t know how to create that, in case you’re wondering).

Here’s the website I found about this, but it doesn’t look like they have any interactive features.

http://www.timebanks.org/

Moltmann’s Theology of the Incarnation

Jürgen Moltmann’s theology of the incarnation is one of the integral concepts underpinning his entire theology.  His perspective takes the incarnation very seriously and this leads him to some radical theological conclusions about the relationship between God and the world. His theology of the incarnation is not itself radical, but he does not abandon it as he reaches conclusions about that it means for the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.  In this paper, I will attempt to describe Moltmann’s theology of the incarnation in detail and demonstrate how it is central to his understanding of the Jesus’ crucifixion.

Read the rest of this entry »

Homemade Butter

My schedule this semester is arranged such that I have every Thursday and Friday off. Rather than just fritter this time away, I’ve decided that I’m going to spend it doing things I enjoy, like cooking. And since I have this blog, I might as well document my projects.

I found a few sets of instructions for how to make butter, but essentially it’s just a matter of over-whipping cream. I decided to try the food processor method but I immediately regretted it, because my little thrift store Cuisinart didn’t hold an entire quart of cream.

Cream
Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

Theological Reflection on The Move Doubt

Here’s a paper I wrote for my Systematic theology class about the movie Doubt. There are certainly some spoilers (If that movie could have spoilers), but I specifically don’t take sides in the question of “did he do it?”. Enjoy.

doubt-movie

Read the rest of this entry »

Boundaries and Borders

I’ve been reflecting on some of the ideas I’ve been learning about in my Ministry Across Cultures class, and also what I just heard in my class about Paul this morning. The dichotomy that has been trying to hold in tension is between boundaries and borders. I think that distinction is an important one in the way we think of ecumenism and multiculturalism.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

A Different Mirror

differentmirror

I’m going to try to blog all of the little writing assignments I have throughout the semester. In my Ministry Across Cultures class, we’re reading A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki. and have been asked to write a reflection about the first chapter.

Here is the question:
Describe briefly takaki’s frame for what it means to be “American” Using this frame, how might we re-think our idea of what it means to be Lutheran?

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,

My Theology of Baptism

As I’ve pondered my own understanding of baptism recently I have come to realize that it has been somewhat theologically problematic for me. I think that far too often it is treated as a kind of magical act where a baby is insured of a crass kind of “fire insurance”. That understanding of baptism, although it seems quite common in folk piety, is antithetical to my understanding of how God works in the world. So that leaves me with a quandry. If baptism should not be understood in that way, what is it?

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

Taking the Bible literally: Hell

I’ve decided to start a little series on Biblical literalism, since that seems to be at the heart of much of the disagreement in the church. I’ll admit now that I’m not a literalist. So much of the bible was clearly written to be taken as allegory, hyperbole, metaphor, etc. that I can’t imagine how annoyed the authors would be if they knew their words are being taken literally. On the other hand, I don’t believe in just throwing out passages that I don’t like. It’s quite easy to just ignore something we don’t like, but I think the Word of God is revealed most strongly when we find the Gospel hidden in a difficult passage. One of Luther’s great realizations happened when he did exactly this, his understanding of external righteousness came from studying a passage that he felt he just could not accept.

This brings me to my topic today, Hell. I don’t claim to be a Universalist, but I don’t feel a need to refute Universalism either. If Hell exists, I hope that no one ever goes there. My interpretation of the bible in its context suggests that there is something like hell that Jesus is talking about, my faith doesn’t rest on this idea, so usually I don’t bother with it. If the New Testament is read literally, there is no hell. Let me repeat that to make it extra clear, in a literal reading of the New Testament (in Greek) hell is not mentioned. Think I’m wrong? Well read on:

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,

Lord of the Sabbath: Perspectives on Matthew 12:1-8

At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the sabbath; his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. When the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the sabbath.” He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? He entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which it was not lawful for him or his companions to eat, but only for the priests. Or have you not read in the law that on the sabbath the priests in the temple break the sabbath and yet are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is lord of the sabbath.”
(Matthew 12:1-8 NRSV)

In the context of Matthew’s audience, Jesus’ disciples’ violation of the Sabbath is fruitful ground for interpretation. I will be primarily looking at this text from a first century Jewish context, focusing on the five perspectives Jesus uses to justify the actions of the disciples. I have classified these perspectives as; the Davidic precedent, the priestly precedent, Jesus’ comparison to the temple, the reference to Hosea, and the “Lord of the Sabbath” statement. I will also focus on how the story relates to the tone and themes of the rest of Matthew’s gospel. Finally, I will discuss the parallel text in the synoptic gospels and the significance of the difference between those passages.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , ,